Heroes and Heroism: Osama Bin Laden and Prabhakaran - Groundviews
Photo: AP
Osama Bin Laden. Dark avenging hero, Arabian knight, Arabic Lawrence of Arabia. Osama versus the USA: David versus Goliath, a hijacked airliner the stone from his slingshot. Not quite. David didn’t murder Goliath’s family in their tents, leaving Goliath only hobbling. Not every leader or dramatic figure is a hero, and not every force that takes on a much bigger foe is heroic. Not even when that foe has been guilty, as has the USA, of horrible crimes such as the sanctions which were responsible for the deaths of several hundred thousand Iraqi infants.
This is not an argument for pacifism. Or moderation. Heroes are almost always extremists in one way or the other. They seem to seek out or get drawn into ‘extreme situations’ – in which they really come alive. They also ‘take it to the limit/one more time’. (The Eagles). They are not ‘one of ‘and do not comfortably ‘dwell among’. They are different from the rest. Like eagles, lighthouse-keepers or sentinels in a watchtower, they rise ‘above’ or range ‘beyond’ the average, the norm, the ordinary and everyday. They are often martyrs but are almost never angels or saints – purer, more decent than others in any conventionally comprehended sense. Being a-typical, they are not cosseted by and comfortably ensconced in the surrounding society, though there are moments of celebration and felicitation. They bear marks of a certain isolation caused by being out there in the vanguard, since being in the vanguard is a lonely, singular situation. The hero is worn, even misshapen by the wear and tear of going against the grain, of swimming against the tide, of being a voice in the wilderness. Thus he slips, commits mistakes, even crimes. Often his very achievements, including that of sheer survival and outstanding performance against tremendous odds, give him the sin of hubris. A hero is not a safe, regular person. He is dangerously destabilizing to others and dangerous to himself. He lives on the edge; walks the high wire. A creature of conjunctures, at other times he dwells in exile, often ‘internal’ or ‘spiritual’ exile. The hero is also almost always in danger, often of an unspecified yet permanent sort. He has made so many enemies in his odyssey that the danger inheres in the environment in which he exists – and he is so exhausted that he hardly retains his robust capacity to resist and prevail.
Somewhere on Mount Olympus, the Gods compensate for the exceptional strengths and abilities of a hero by giving him blind spots and (fatal) weaknesses. Like Achilles’ Heel. Without these he would be impossible. The hero isn’t a better human being than everyone else. He doesn’t have more endearing qualities. He just has those qualities – or those qualities in greater measure – that are needed to fight evil; for the survival of the community when it is in danger from Evil. In thought and/or in deed, he goes further and faster than most, he’s willing to take more risks. He isn’t good – he’s just better than the rest and morally superior to the enemy he finds himself opposed to and who opposes him. The hero may be horribly flawed; indeed this is almost a structural trait of the heroic profile. Take Othello, Oedipus, Ajax. He may hesitate, vacillate: Gary Cooper in High Noon. Christ at Gethsemane. He may have reprehensible insensitive, even self-serving behavior: Jason. But Jason got the Argonauts through, and it took him to do so. The hero is singular, almost unique. His exceptional qualities – those that enable the community to survive in times of mortal danger – alienate him from the community, sometimes leading to exile or self-exile, and often to his undoing. Hence the tragic hero: the Greek and the Shakespearean audiences knew that the hero must fall, and yet is redeemed in some ultimate moral or cosmic sense by his exceptional virtues.
Dayan Jayatilleka On Fidel Castro - Bookshelf
Fidel's ethics of violence, the moral dimension of the political thought of Fidel Castro
Sri Lanka, the travails of a democracy, unfinished war, protracted crisis
Focoism is the theory of the mobile guerrilla nucleus; a theory associated with the names of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. 2. ...Radical philosophy
Divine violence, fatal splitting Dayan Jayatilleka, Fidel's Ethics of Violence: The Moral Dimension of the Political Thought of Fidel Castro, Pluto Press, ...Castro
Several interesting accounts sympathetic to Castro in different degrees can ... New York, 1987); Dayan Jayatilleka's Fidel's Ethics of Violence: the Moral ...Cuban Studies 39
Jayatilleka, Dayan. Fidel's Ethics of Violence: The Moral Dimension of the Political Thought of Fidel Castro. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Pluto Press, 2007. 235 pp. ...Day-to-day Guide Directory
FEDERALiDEA: "A Profound and important work" - Fidel's Ethics ...
questions the Sri Lankan academic Dayan Jayatilleka in his latest book. ... Dayan Jayatilleka shows how Fidel Castro was capable of defining these impassable limits ...
Fidel Castro contributed an Alternative Ethic of Rebellion ...
Home " Fidel Castro contributed an Alternative Ethic of Rebellion and Resistance - La Jornada ... on the subject of Cuban President Fidel Castro and Jayatilleka's new ...
transCurrents: Dayan's Powerful Argument on Contemporary ...
Dayan's Powerful Argument on Contemporary Relevance of Castro or Fidelismo ... Jayatilleka's provocative central argument is that the moral dimension of Fidel Castro's ...
Fidel's Ethics of Violence | Dayan Jayatilleka | Macmillan
Fidel's Ethics of Violence by Dayan Jayatilleka. Fidel Castro's most original contribution to... Bonus Publisher Materials: Author Biography
Fidel Castro: The Last Titan | Asian Tribune
By Dayan Jayatilleka. Three dramatic, developing stories seize the attention of the public ... In a recent book on Raul Castro titled After Fidel, the CIA’s most ...